Interval reviewed Version 1 -
Read 100% of the Item
Normally, I have a problem with writing that’s completely abstract. In this piece, you mention no names, no places, no specific situations whatsoever, no images, nothing. Again, normally, I think that writing stands on the virtue of its being able to relate abstract concepts indirectly through effective imagery and metaphor. However, in this case, and I think due to the clarity, frankness, good grammar, etc. of this piece, it’s effective. I think perhaps its completely “bare” nature allows the reader to fill in so many blanks where they’ve had one, or ten, or one hundred identical situations, and so every word is a placeholder for the reader’s experience. I like that this piece establishes the notion that the writer is letting loose with a flood of potentially repressed opinions on the nature of the friend’s life. Overall, if you can write more pieces that have the same capacity for reader sympathy, you will be a successful author.