Criticism / For Emily Gould (Analysis)

I don’t get it?

I understand the first half only.

I did not understand this fully, but that did not stop me from enjoying it. One thing that really halted the piece for me was n+1. Symbols always jolt you, and I think sometimes it can be effective, but here it ruined it for me a bit. Maybe you should think of changing? I’m not sure how that would work, though.

I found it confusing. Gawker/n+1 are both unusual words – I am not sure that n+1 can be called a word in the context of written material. I would say it is more appropriate for street-speak or IM chat.

I have no idea what this means. I also have no idea if other people have better deciphering skills…