Poetry / The Path Less Travelled (Analysis)

It had a good message.

I am not a lover of poetry, so I may be a bit harsher than most. The rhythm was consistent, but didn’t seem to add to the words, add to the emotion, or anything like that, so it seemed pointless to be in the form of poetry. I question a few word choices, but perhaps it’s for the sake of rhythm or what not. However, go through and see which words can improve without taking away from the “poetry” of it.

lu.

All very true and well put.  

However it all seems cliche right down to the title, although Frost said it was a road not taken and not a path less traveled.  Unlike Frost’s work this title doesn’t sweep down into the body of the poem – there is no visual imagery to support ‘taking the path less travelled’.  The reader is ‘told’ things that they can do but the writing lacks metaphorical complexity to send the moral message and evoke an emotion:
things in life don’t always have to be bad – why not?/lacks emotion
things in life don’t always have to be had – why not?/lacks emotion
vs.
“Yet knowing how way leads on to way,  
I doubted if I should ever come back.”(Frost) – reeks of self-doubt and emotion

Structurally I am curious why there is no punctuation?  
L3 – all/all seems redundant…is one used for filler to make the meter work?

In the last line why is you spelled ‘u’ – is there a significance?
yourselfb – looks like a typo