Journal, Diary, & Blogging / Pontification on the inane?
A farce really. that of which is only written of in great books .the sad satire of the human agenda. the need for organization and disorientation together creating a pathetic souffle of modern life. It is the soul, really, that compromises these things. Them which, unknown, create a sense of havoc in one’s well-being. To the point where the author of these true injustices is completely guilt-free in the realization and moreso the conviction, that the author is without justification for dissidence. The author is completely at will to that certain inspiration of the muse. Drunk, as may well be… and hard as all hell to make sense of it all; the author is yet…just left with ramblings. The inane pontification of that which destroy the body and soul by lack of comprehnsion. Says the author “perhaps too much burroughs or thompson, perhaps this is what is seething to this soul of mine. Perhaps, I say, perhaps, ....perhaps this is all just this willful illusion of granduer. This jesuit thought that man can be quite greater to fellow man than he thinks feesible or convenient.” And thus far, the mind of the nocturne has awakened once again in a state of self-righteous absurdity. Is it not only this that keeps the keeper awake in the night? Is it not only this?
One may wonder about for days pondering these perplexities. Wondering if it is the culmination of incessant ramblings brought about by the thirst for truth….in any way shape or form, that is, ...or if it is, perhaps the absolute zero of complete and total inihilation. Nihilism at it’s best. Insanity, per se. That is, maybe not the question to be argued, but moreso a moral question…...Are we to go on and on about in daily life perplexed as damn well any human not completely demoralized and desensitized may be or are we…as a species…meant to question the very absurdity of the existence of life itself…In whatever form.
The complete and total profundity and on the other hand simianity and mamality of man?
That of which is of use to be pondering is quite oft of no use trying to solve. That is, the complexities of man, in this author’s opinion, are those mysteries that keep that of whom is engaged, compeletely involved.
And for that reason, this author, although “completely involved”, chooses to therefore be disconnected from the very speech of which those with the forked tongues and large, gaping mouths – agenda-ready and completely pre-convinced – choose to determine their course of action from. One cannot idly sit by and watch the company and team-ready agenda; the wholistic agenda; the very seer-sucking lips of corporate jargon – agenda, take unto the middle american and suck the very lives out of which is held so sacred. And all of which is little much than quite timidly objected by those on the side of the RIGHT and TRUE.
And those very same bitter-breathed, cracked and scarred-lipped, and sour-tongued people are those that are first to stand off in the four-square game of justice. An emminating irony and metaphysical slap-in-the-face for all who , just prior, believed in that which was right and true.
The CONTROLLING population has this emminating and quite horribly-beautiful quality to distract the bad injustice of that which is truly good. “Don’t mind the rotting display of these oranges,” they say, “look at the fresh-picked, ripely-grown apples…red and just ready for a bite…from you, the american people.” They caw until you understand. “Remember we’re not Amercant’s, we’re Americans” and that is all that is left to say. ALL that makes sense and rings into what can only be understood as RIGHT and TRUE.
You need to log in to urbis or create an urbis account to review this writing.
Reviews
Sort Reviews by Newest | Oldest | Highest Quality | Lowest Quality | Newest Comments |
This was actually pretty good. I’ve consider going back and possibly revising several typographical errors in addition to several small structural inconsistancies.
You have something good here. I would certainly like to see more of your work in the future.
My only suggestion is to go back over it and not be so liberal with the elipses where perhaps a comma, semi-colon or even a dash would suffice.
- add/view comments (0)
hmmm. a lot to think about here. you’re a strong writer and this piece flows pretty well. the opening, i felt though, was not strong enough, and failed to draw me in. it just starts with a sort of barage, and there’s no frame of reference attached, which leaves the reader a bit confused, and gives the feeling that one is falling off a cliff. I think more can be done here to not only give the reader a starting point, but help develop the voice of the author as well.
And I know this is a complex subject, and could be debated over for days, but you really need to put forth some sort of definition of what is RIGHT and TRUE in order for this piece to have any meaning. You ask a lot of rhetorical questions, but you’re failing to show us what these questions are getting at. What is the reader supposed to take away from this piece about how RIGHT and TRUE can be defined, and are applicable to our lives?
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
Review item
Add to faves
GENERAL
REVIEW QUEUE
Ratings & Rankings
