Journalism / The Invisible Hand

“The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 is a United States federal law which established the requirement for paying prevailing wages on public works projects. All federal government construction contracts, and most contracts for federally assisted construction over $2,000, must include provisions for paying workers on-site no less than the locally prevailing wages and benefits paid on similar projects.”

“Union supporters of Davis-Bacon point to a 2002 case known as “Brazier Construction vs. Elaine Chao, Secretary of the Department of Labor.” In it, Judge William B. Bryant (himself African-American) rejected that Davis-Bacon was a Jim Crow law. He stated: “Americans of all races were in need of aid from the government during the Great Depression. Congress enacted the DBA (Davis Bacon Act) to assure workers a fair wage, provide local contractors a fair opportunity to compete for local government contracts and to preserve its own ability to distribute employment and federal money equitably through public works projects. With the claim rejected, the plaintiffs did not appeal. Despite notable attempts to repeal the Davis-Bacon Act, the law for the most part continues to enjoy often bi-partisan local support across the nation.”

The above excerpt is taken from wikipedia.com as a general description of prevailing wage.  Most of you outside of the construction field do not fully grasp the concept of prevailing wage, the consequence it places on the taxpayer, and the chilling effect it has on business.  Therefore, I am offering you a small peak into the modern day Tammany Hall.

Since I am from Kentucky, I am going to use the state of Kentucky’s prevailing wage rates to formulate my argument.

In the state of Kentucky, prevailing wage rates are determined and set in each of Kentucky’s 120 counties.  The wages are broken down by classification of work, i.e., electrician, general laborer, carpenters, cement masons, etc.  Each work classification is then prescribed a wage rate per hour based on the general “prevailing wage” of the county.  These wages are only payable to workers on public works projects, whether or not the project workforce is unionized or private, which are funded by taxpayer dollars.  The set wages are reviewed periodically, county by county, and a new wage determination is made which usually raises the hourly rate for all categories of work.    All county wage determinations for the state of Kentucky can be found at:

http://www.labor.ky.gov/ows/employmentstandards/prevailingwage/wagerates/  

The general idea of the Davis Bacon Act is sound and helped early 20th century workers receive a fair and equitable wage for public works projects in their communities.  Additionally, this legislation made it difficult for outside contractors to under bid local contractors with cheap labor, streaming north from poorer states in the south.  During the Great Depression, the Davis Bacon Act provided a welcomed opportunity for all construction workers and helped pull the United States out of a depression ravaged economy.  Woefully, the same cannot be said for the economy of today.

Workers should be justly compensated for work performed at a rate which the market can bear.  Paying employees a fair an equitable wage is a fundamental characteristic in a free-market economy and a direct result of industrialization.  With that said, the market is therefore responsible for setting wages for all workers.  Modern day “prevailing wage” is nothing more than a union creation geared at choking out private competition and costing the local taxpayer billions of dollars.  My assertion is counterintuitive to the aforementioned decision as handed down by Judge Bryant when stating prevailing wages provide local contractors a fair opportunity to compete for local government contracts.  This may have been true in 1920’s America but not in America today.  I will show you why.

The problem with the Davis Bacon Act inside the state of Kentucky today must be addressed using a two-pronged approach.  The fundamental ideas of the Davis Bacon Act are:  

1.      Prevailing wages provide local contractors a fair and equitable   opportunity to compete for local government contracts.

2.      Tax payers will bear wages for general works projects far in excess of the industry average as set forth by the free market.  

To further illustrate point 1, I am going to reference the prevailing wage rate for an electrician who is performing work on a state funded construction project in Rowan county.  As set forth on August 17, 2007, an electrician doing work in Rowan county is to make $45.53 per hour.  This wage consists of a base wage of $28.02 and a fringe benefit of $17.51.  A private, non-unionized contractor must pay the electrician $45.53 per hour of work if the said electrician is doing electrical work on the project.  A unionized contractor will pay the same electrician substantially less than the $45.53 per hour wage rate as the unionized employee will be charged for the fringe benefit.  Simply stated, private contractors, who all ready pay fringe benefits (health insurance, vacation, life insurance, 401K, etc) as part of their over-head structure must still pay prevailing wage fringe benefits while the unionized contractor can extract the fringe benefit from the employee as payment for the same benefits, thus eliminating the overhead costs of said benefits.  This decided advantage eliminates an even playing field and, in turn, gives unionized contractors the upper hand in obtaining public works projects.  

With that being said, private contractors are still successful in competing with the union for public works projects.  This is true due to the vast amount of public works projects available for bidding in a given time period.  Whether or not a project is staffed with a private or unionized workforce, the cost to the tax payer is the same.  This is solely because of the Davis Bacon Act and its chilling effect on the economy.  This brings me to point 2.

Should the tax payer bear the cost of wage elevations directly associated with the Davis Bacon Act?  Let’s go back to the electrician working on a public works project in Rowan county, Kentucky.  As previously stated, the wage charged to the tax payer for each hour of work on this project is $45.53.  If this electrician were to work uninterrupted for one year, this electrician would earn a yearly gross salary of $94,702.40.  While this figure may seem high, it pails in comparison when looking at the job as a whole.  

Let’s figure that the public works project in question is the construction of a large high school requiring 20,000 hours of electrical work from start to finish.  The prevailing wage in the Rowan county is $45.53 so the cost to the tax payer on labor alone is $910,600.  This figure does not include material costs or any other labor and material costs incurred on any other facet of construction.  

So as educated and logically minded tax payers, you and I are expected to believe that electricians, based on the prevailing wages (accepted, market bearing wages of today) of a depressed eastern Kentucky county should earn somewhere in the neighborhood of 100K per year.  That being said, the state of Kentucky sponsored website gohigherky.org lists the national average salary of the same electrician as $43,160.00 per year or an average wage of $20.75 per hour work. By using the national average salary for an electrician, the electrical work on the high school project is now reduced to $415,000 thus saving the tax payer $495,600 on electrical work alone.  It is the American tax payer who is asked to unnecessarily bear this burden.  This information can be easily accessed at http://www.gohigherky.org/career/careercenter/career_detail.asp?c=47%2D2111%2E00&pr=%2Fcareer%2Fcareercenter%2Fcareer%5Falpha%5Flist%2Easp?o

On all public works projects, across all scopes of construction, the Davis Bacon Act is creating an uneven playing field by allowing unionized contractors to receive public works projects at a reduced labor cost while costing the tax payer needless billions of dollars annually by fixing wages well above the invisible hand of the free market.  One can only surmise that the Davis Bacon Act exists today solely due to politicians casting aside our tax dollars in a selfish attempt to cater to the powerful union lobbies.  It is a measured attempt for politicians to retain their place in government.  It is corruption paramount to Tammany Hall.  It is collusion comparable to OPEC.  American tax payers should demand accountability in the US treasury.

I will leave you with a few examples of national average wages for other professions as set forth on gohigherky.org:

Physician Assistants – $62,410.00 per year  

Optometrists – $89,980.00 per year

Accountants – $50,690.00 per year

Lawyers – $91,920.00 per year

Chiropractors – $76,870.00 per year

I’ll let you draw your own conclusions.

You need to log in to urbis or create an urbis account to review this writing.

Reviews

Sort Reviews by  Newest |  Oldest |  Highest Quality |  Lowest Quality |  Newest Comments | 

 
littledevilgirl avatar General Stranger

June 03, 2008

littledevilgirl

personal info reviewer stats
littledevilgirl reviewed Version 1 - Read 100% of the Item
This 350 word review has not been unlocked.
rustrotdecay avatar General Stranger

May 18, 2008

rustrotdecay

personal info reviewer stats
rustrotdecay reviewed Version 1 - Read 100% of the Item

In your third paragraph you used the word “peak” where you should have used “peek.”

You later say that the Davis Bacon Act made it harder for people from poorer states to do business in Kentucky, and right after that you say that it gave opportunities to all construction workers.  At this point it seems like the act only benefited companies that existed before it was created, and that it pretty much left anyone that wanted to start from scratch, especially people from out-of-state, screwed.

On page four you say “pails” instead of “pales.”  Pails are containers.

I agree with most of what you’ve said but it sounds like the act was put in place to screw everybody in the first place, and that they were using the Depression to manipulate the people of Kentucky.  The easiest way to blunt freedom is to sharpen security, and it’s easy to convince a group of people that are terrified into sharpening security.

I think you did your homework and you sound vested in this issue—I’d suggest that you do some sort of investigation to obtain information regarding it that is less publicly accessible.

swissmonk avatar General Stranger

April 27, 2008

swissmonk

REVIEW QUALITY: 100.0%(1 vote ) personal info reviewer stats
swissmonk reviewed Version 1 - Read 100% of the Item

“During the Great Depression, the Davis Bacon Act provided a welcomed opportunity for all construction workers and helped pull the United States out of a depression ravaged economy.  Woefully, the same cannot be said for the economy of today.”

I would take it further and say that the Davis Bacon Act, along with similar laws, prolonged the Great Depression.  Roosevelt was determined to keep wages high even when the market of the time couldn’t sustain it.  The sentence before this betrays the ugly truth of the act; it made it difficult for contractors to underbid local companies with cheap labor.  In a sense, the act meant that the cost of whatever was built was higher, since the buyer was forced to use a more expensive local contractor, AND the “cheap labor from the north” was effectively pushed out of work.  It created unemployment for the sake of employing others.

You are dead on when you show the effects of this law in modern times though.  Essentially, this goes beyond taxpayers having to pay these salaries; it has more destructive effects on the economy.  Money is being taken from taxpayers and given to another group of people, which is money that those taxpayers aren’t spending on other goods and services, which collectively lowers the demand for those goods and services.  A lower demand means people in those sectors get laid off.  It is also raising the cost for wahtever industry these subsidised workers are employed in, which has the same effect.

I’ve rated this pretty high; this is a very well-written piece and you do a good job at providing numbers that allow the reader to see where your argument is going.  Best of luck

jfmalewitz avatar General Stranger

December 06, 2007

jfmalewitz

personal info reviewer stats
jfmalewitz reviewed Version 1 - Read 100%% of the Item

“Therefore, I am offering you a small peak into the modern day Tammany Hall.

Since I am from Kentucky, I am going to use the state of Kentucky’s prevailing wage rates to formulate my argument.” Bringing yourself into the piece makes this an opinion piece or a letter to the editor. It is too long for both in my mind. But you do bring up valid points, and it could be worked into, say, something for magazines. However, starting with two paragraphs of quotes is not a good lead, journalism or non-fiction. I would include your points along with each statement. Maybe after the first paragraph having a short summary of what it meant in your opinion, and then moving to the next quote. Also, Wikipedia, though an awesome site, isn’t a reputable site, for a school essay or a full length piece. I  have used it once in my journalism career, but with a much smaller mindset of backing something up.
The more I read this, the more it sounds like a business document. A journalism piece would have some more human elements to it, like an interview with a respect individual. I could see this finding its way online on a site, perhaps. It seems to bring in some important points. I guess it depends on what you want to do with it. For journalism, it is too long. For magazines, not entertaining enough. For a blog or site, still probably too long, but if that is probably the best possibility. Hope some of this helped. Thanks for letting me read this.

mizzpris avatar General Stranger

November 30, 2007

mizzpris

REVIEW QUALITY: 0.0%(1 vote ) personal info reviewer stats
mizzpris reviewed Version 1 - Read 100%% of the Item

This is a very interesting topic.  I believed that it was researched very well and the point was made.  However I don’t feel that this article is appealing to the general public or to a widely criculated printed material… I felt like it was a court case and you were a lawyer.  I didn’t enjoy how it flowed, the sentences were so long and drawn out.  I get the idea that some of the concepts the author speaks of are borderline communist or socialist; these points of view are so frowned upon even in todays american society… It is so rare to have them expressed while dancing around what you really mean to say.  I didn’t like this at all, a lot more could have been done with it!

Huntress080 avatar General Stranger

November 30, 2007

Huntress080

personal info reviewer stats
Huntress080 reviewed Version 1 - Read 100%% of the Item

Over all I thought that this was a good piece that needed a little bit of tweaking. There were parts of this piece that felt more like a college essay than journalism to me. I think that when it comes to journalism you have to avoid the trap of having your piece sound like an essay rather than an informing piece.

PiercePresley avatar General Stranger

November 27, 2007

PiercePresley

REVIEW QUALITY: 0.0%(1 vote ) personal info reviewer stats
PiercePresley reviewed Version 1 - Read 100%% of the Item

A piece of libertarian free market uber alles propaganda, this “educational” piece takes facts and claims they support the author’s assertion that the Davis Bacon Act thwarts the invisible hand of the free market economy, a mortal sin in libertarian worldviews. Not well argued, not well founded and not well written—in fact, it looks like a recycled academic piece on the DBA and nothing approaching journalism even in these depraved times. Best left in some poor professor’s grading pile and out of the light of day.

blimprue avatar General Stranger

November 26, 2007

blimprue

personal info reviewer stats
blimprue reviewed Version 1 - Read 100%% of the Item

This is an interesting piece.  I do have one suggestion: it might be even more powerful to compare the added costs that this act incurs upon taxpayers vs other types of public works boondoggles-studies about extra costs incurred by delaying infrastructure repair; the cost to taxpayers of useless projects that exist solely as a function of earmarks etc.

I assume this could be done with local examples or by generating national estimates.

Overall, an unusual angle on a much neglected part of public policy matters.

AmyWalker avatar General Stranger

November 24, 2007

AmyWalker

personal info reviewer stats
AmyWalker reviewed Version 1 - Read 100%% of the Item

It was an interesting written piece that you’ve got here and honestly not something I would usually read.But am glad that I did though.
Where did you get the inspiration to write something like this, its not your usual typical topic within journalism well at least in my eyes but it was good to my surprise.

Keep up the great work

Amy

Blueldybug avatar General Stranger

November 17, 2007

Blueldybug

personal info reviewer stats
Blueldybug reviewed Version 1 - Read 100%% of the Item

This should clearly be considered an opinion piece. There is too much personal commentary for it to be considered merely informative. With some re-structuring and editing the article could work. The subject matter is about two important news elements, people and money.

However, this article is written in essay style rather than journalism AP style. – One should never use quotes as long as the lead quote and second paragraph of this piece. The subject matter is relevent, but the quote leading into it is boring. The article tends to repeat itself.

Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Next →

Creator
stormplay avatar

stormplay

Age: 33
Loc: Lexington, KY
Gen: M
Last Login: May 20
Relevant Links
Item Stats

GENERAL

12 Reviews 2 Comments
Version 1
Latest Activity: 6 months ago

REVIEW QUEUE

Appeared in Queue: 344 Times
Skipped: 7 Times
Large_criteria Ratings & Rankings
Tags

There are no tags for this item.